SayPro Documents Required from SayPro Employees Comparative Layout Grid (Before & After screenshots from SayPro platform) from SayPro Monthly February SCMR-17 SayPro Quarterly Responsive Design by SayPro Online Marketplace Office under SayPro Marketing Royalty SCMR
1. Overview of the Comparative Layout Grid Requirement
The Comparative Layout Grid is a document required to visually showcase the before and after states of any design changes implemented on the SayPro platform. This comparative analysis helps highlight the differences in layout, structure, and user interface (UI) elements following updates made as part of the SCMR-17 Responsive Design initiative.
The Comparative Layout Grid allows teams across SayPro, including design, development, marketing, and QA, to track the effectiveness of the changes and ensure alignment with responsive design best practices. The documentation supports transparency, internal communication, and evaluation of the impact of layout adjustments on user experience, accessibility, and platform functionality.
2. Purpose of the Comparative Layout Grid
The Comparative Layout Grid serves several purposes:
- Visual Documentation: Provides a clear, side-by-side comparison of the previous and updated layout design, allowing stakeholders to easily see what has changed.
- Design Evaluation: Helps evaluate the impact of design changes, particularly how they improve or affect mobile and desktop responsiveness.
- Usability Testing: Assists with tracking improvements based on user feedback and testing, ensuring that design changes are user-centered.
- Quality Assurance: Ensures that design updates are functioning as expected across different devices, screen sizes, and platforms.
- Reporting: Provides concrete visual evidence for the SayPro Quarterly Responsive Design Report, showing progress and changes made as part of SCMR-17.
3. Who Must Submit the Comparative Layout Grid?
The following teams are responsible for creating and submitting the Comparative Layout Grid:
Role/Team | Responsibility |
---|---|
UI/UX Designers | Create and provide visual mockups for before-and-after layout comparisons. |
Product Managers | Coordinate and oversee the submission of the comparative grid to ensure alignment with business objectives and feature rollouts. |
Developers | Implement design changes and provide technical insights regarding layout updates. |
QA Engineers | Ensure that layout changes are tested across various devices and screen sizes to verify responsiveness. |
Marketing Team | Review design updates to ensure that visual changes align with brand guidelines and user engagement objectives. |
4. Structure of the Comparative Layout Grid
The Comparative Layout Grid should consist of clear visual comparisons between the previous design (before the changes) and the new design (after the changes). The layout should be divided into sections that are easy to navigate and compare. Key components of the grid include:
A. Grid Layout Overview
- Title of Change: The title of the design change being compared.
- Example: “Mobile Navigation Menu Update”
- Device/Screen Size: The screen sizes or devices (e.g., desktop, tablet, mobile) that the design changes are being evaluated on.
- Example: “Mobile – 375px width (iPhone X)” and “Desktop – 1200px width”
- Date of Submission: The date the grid was created or submitted for review.
- Example: “February 25, 2025”
- Version Numbers: Indicate the version of the layout before and after the update.
- Example: “Version 1.2 (Before)” vs. “Version 2.0 (After)”
B. Visual Comparison of Layouts
- Side-by-Side Screenshots: The grid should display screenshots of the before and after states, showing the layout on both mobile and desktop versions.
- Before (Old Design): A screenshot showing how the layout appeared before the design changes were made.
- After (New Design): A screenshot showcasing the updated design after the changes were implemented.
- The screenshots should be placed side-by-side, allowing for easy visual comparison.
- Highlighted Changes: Use callouts or annotations to emphasize the most notable differences between the two layouts.
- Example:
- “Mobile navigation menu moved to a sticky header.”
- “New section added for quick links on the homepage.”
- “Font size increased for better readability on mobile.”
- Example:
- Responsive Design Elements: For each screenshot, clearly show how the design adapts to different screen sizes. This will include any changes made to ensure the layout is fully responsive on mobile devices, tablets, and desktops.
- Example: “The desktop version has a two-column layout, while the mobile version stacks content vertically to improve mobile navigation.”
C. Explanation of Layout Changes
- Design Rationale: Briefly explain why these changes were made and what specific problems or feedback they are intended to address.
- Example: “The mobile navigation menu was moved to a sticky header to improve accessibility and reduce user frustration when scrolling on mobile devices. This was based on feedback that users had trouble locating key sections of the website while navigating.”
- Expected Outcome: Detail what benefits are expected from the layout change, such as improvements in user engagement, load times, or conversions.
- Example: “We expect this change to reduce bounce rates and improve navigation on mobile devices. This should increase user satisfaction and time spent on site.”
D. Additional Visual Elements
- Device-Specific Screenshots: Include separate grid sections for mobile, tablet, and desktop views to highlight how the layout changes affect each device.
- Example: For mobile and tablet screenshots, focus on touch elements like buttons, menus, and touch interactions.
- Interactive Elements: If applicable, highlight changes made to interactive elements such as buttons, dropdowns, or forms.
- Example: “Updated call-to-action buttons on mobile to improve user interaction.”
E. User Flow and Impact
- Flow Diagrams: Include diagrams or flowcharts showing how users navigate the platform before and after the design changes.
- Example: “The new sticky header ensures that users can always see the primary navigation, improving overall usability and reducing the number of steps needed to reach key sections.”
- Impact on KPIs: Highlight any expected impacts on key performance indicators (KPIs), such as engagement rate, bounce rate, conversion rate, etc.
- Example: “We anticipate a 10% increase in mobile conversion rates following the introduction of the sticky header design.”
5. Format and Submission Process
📎 Document Format:
- File Type: PDF or PowerPoint presentation
- File Naming Convention:
SayPro_Comparative_Layout_Grid_<DeviceType>_<MonthYear>_<Department>
.
Example:SayPro_Comparative_Layout_Grid_Mobile_Feb2025_DesignTeam.pdf
📂 Upload Location:
- Shared Drive: Upload the comparative layout grid to the designated folder on the internal drive for SCMR-17.
- Path:
SayPro > SCMR-17 > Layout_Grid_Comparisons > February_2025
.
- Path:
📆 Submission Deadline:
- February 28, 2025, for inclusion in the SayPro Quarterly Responsive Design Report.
6. Review and Approval Process
Once submitted, the Comparative Layout Grid will undergo review by the UI/UX Design Team, Product Managers, and QA Engineers to ensure the design changes are functional, aesthetically pleasing, and enhance user experience across all devices.
- Initial Review: Evaluating the effectiveness of layout changes based on user feedback and design goals.
- Approval: The grid will be reviewed by senior stakeholders, including the Marketing and SEO Teams, for alignment with branding and optimization strategies.
- Implementation: Once approved, the design changes will be rolled out to the live platform with a final review to ensure everything functions as expected.
7. Conclusion
The Comparative Layout Grid is a crucial document that provides a clear visual representation of before and after design changes. This documentation serves as both a communication tool and an evaluation tool, enabling teams to assess the impact of the design changes, track improvements in mobile and desktop responsiveness, and ensure the overall user experience is enhanced.
By using this grid, SayPro ensures transparency in its design process, providing insights into how each update improves usability, accessibility, and performance. The Comparative Layout Grid will play a key role in the SCMR-17 Quarterly Responsive Design Report and help guide future design decisions.